FARCOM / BUSINESS LOGIC, BUILT IN

Custom software development—
your logic at the heart of the system.

For order management, approval workflows, resource allocation, and organizational reporting, we design software around your rules. First, we assess whether a new module, better connections between existing tools, or a new system will answer the need most effectively.

Conceptual architecture connecting operational systems in FARCOM’s dark visual environment
LOGIC / DATA / OPERATIONS

Engineering experience
for real operational problems.

15+years of FARCOM
150+successful projects
Meet FARCOM ↗

01 / BUILD WHAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE

We do not rebuild everything;
we build what makes your business different.

Sometimes configuring the current tool is enough; sometimes the answer is one custom module or the right integration. A complete build makes sense when the organization’s distinctive logic is not served well by existing solutions.

01

Sales and contracts

Pricing, authority limits, contract approval, and handover to operations—based on the organization’s real rules.

Business rules
02

Operations and resources

Work allocation, capacity control, delivery planning, and outcome recording, with a clear owner and status for every stage.

Workflow
03

Data and decisions

Consistent metric definitions, change history, and role-specific reporting, with a named source of truth for every data point.

Management reporting

02 / YOUR RULES, IN ACTION

The difference in custom software
is visible in its decisions.

Change two conditions in a sample order. See how inventory and authority limits determine what the system does next.

F / RULE ENGINEINTERACTIVE LAB · SAMPLE SCENARIO

Change the order conditions.

The system should make decisions according to your rules—not merely store information.

Evaluation result

Ready for operations

  1. Receive order and conditions
  2. Check inventory
  3. Check discount authority
  4. Send to the operations queue

Both conditions are satisfied, so the order can enter the operations workflow.

This demonstration only illustrates decision logic; it is not connected to a real order, inventory, or business system.

03 / CONNECTED, NOT ENTANGLED

Components stay connected;
responsibilities stay clear.

We define the boundary of every part so changing one rule does not require changing the entire system. Architecture is selected around project size and complexity.

01

A clear source of truth

Define which system owns customer, order, and inventory data. Validation and synchronization begin with this decision.

02

Integration with defined failure behavior

Review API availability, service limits, and technical access. Error logging, retries, and duplicate-operation prevention are part of integration design.

03

Security within system logic

Permissions are not merely hidden in the interface. Server-side access control, event logging, and data protection are defined according to project risk.

04

Development that can continue

Testing critical rules, documentation, monitoring, and release practices belong in the delivery plan. The maintenance service level is defined in the agreement.

ENGINEERING / FIT FOR PURPOSE

Custom engineering; technical choices with a reason.

We select technology around the data, integrations, deployment environment, and maintenance needs. The final stack can differ from one project to another.

Current technology, selected around your project.

React
Next.js
TypeScript
Node.js
PostgreSQL
Docker
WordPress
Python

The final stack is selected around security, performance, integration, and maintainability.

04 / A CONTROLLED TRANSITION

A new system,
with a considered transition.

If the current system is still in use, we align replacement with operational reality. Data migration and team training are not end-of-project tasks; they are planned from the beginning.

Tell us about the current system ↗
  1. 01

    Understand and prioritize

    Define one critical workflow, its acceptance criteria, and the first-release scope with your team.

  2. 02

    Build and test in a limited environment

    Review rules and failure paths in a test environment and gather feedback from key users.

  3. 03

    Run a trial data migration

    Define data mapping, result reconciliation, and a rollback plan before the main transfer.

  4. 04

    Launch and continue development

    Training, handover documentation, monitoring, and future releases follow the agreed scope.

EXPERIENCE / BEFORE THE NEXT BUILD

Behind the system, a team for what comes next.

Review FARCOM’s work and talk with us about experience relevant to your organization’s scope. The interactive display on this page is an educational demonstration, not a client project.

Before commissioning custom software

Explore scope, cost, and handover

Custom software or an off-the-shelf solution?

If a reputable tool can meet the need through configuration, building from scratch is not automatically the better choice. Custom development becomes valuable when critical business rules, integrations, or operational requirements are not adequately supported by existing tools.

What determines development cost?

Form count alone is not a useful measure. Rule and exception complexity, data volume and quality, integrations, security level, and deployment requirements all affect the estimate. Initial analysis should produce a measurable scope and an incremental delivery plan.

What should be included in handover?

The agreement should define code ownership and access, documentation, training, deployment environments, and maintenance responsibility. Acceptance criteria for each workflow are also set before implementation so delivery can be evaluated against real system behavior.

What should we prepare for the discovery meeting?

Describe one example process, the people involved, approvals, and exceptions. A list of current tools, essential reports, approximate user counts, and deployment constraints helps define the first release. Synthetic or anonymized examples are enough for this initial review.

Consider the cost after handover

Hosting, software licences, monitoring, backups, and updates are part of operating the system. Defect resolution, user support, and new capability development need separate scopes and estimates so responsibilities remain clear.

BEFORE WE ENGINEER

Questions to answer before we begin.

F / CLARITY

Clarify the path before we begin.

Prepare your project brief ↗
Where does a custom software project begin?

With an understanding of the process, users, data, and constraints. The output is an initial scope and a delivery map that supports a practical decision.

Can a legacy system be replaced incrementally?

Yes. In many projects, staged migration, temporary coexistence, and controlled data validation reduce risk compared with a single replacement event.

How are code ownership and future development handled?

Ownership scope, documentation, and the handover method are defined in the project agreement, while the technical structure is designed for maintenance and continued development.

Do we need to replace all our current software?

No. We first assess whether configuring an existing tool, adding one module, or connecting systems can solve the problem. Full replacement is only one option and depends on technical limits, maintenance cost, and operational need.

How are development time and cost determined?

Roles, business rules, exceptions, integrations, and data quality are reviewed. The first release is estimated with defined outputs and acceptance criteria; scope changes or external-service dependencies can affect the plan.

Can the software be deployed on our organization’s servers?

The deployment environment is selected around organizational policy, existing infrastructure, and support needs. Required resources, maintenance access, backups, and recovery ownership should be defined before implementation.

YOUR PROCESS / OUR NEXT CONVERSATION

Which part of your work
needs a better system?

Let’s begin with one real process—
not a long list of features.

Start a technical conversation